The People’s National Movement boasts that in its institution of party politics on the body politic, among its founding principles was to “subscribe to the highest standards of morality in the conduct of its public and private affairs” as reminded by then Leader Patrick Manning on the party’s 50th anniversary.
Note – highest standards in the conduct of ITS affairs. Recent developments in which a sitting Minister is now charged for less than the highest standards of morality in public affairs follow the current PNM Leader’s recent boast that his administration was squeaky clean. Not even the fact that following-the-money has revealed that the alleged fraudulent and laundering activity continued well into the term of his administration allows reality to dawn on him. This situation has also spawned another as the damage control exercise has once again brought into focus the prerogatives, almost royal, of the Political Leader and PM to appoint officeholders at the monarch’s pleasure. Revelations, resignations and repeat of appointment exercises have followed. The Leader of the other aspect of the PNM-UNC political monopoly sensing opportunity does not recognise her own duplicity as she keeps another public official charged with less than the highest standards at Local Government level. Respect for Public Offices These developments have foisted the question: DO POLITICIANS AND PUBLIC OFFICEHOLDERS GET TO CHOOSE WHICH OFFICE TO RESPECT? A Senator is comfortable to sit in the Legislature- the Senate. But when he is to put in the Executive- the Government as a Minister, and his past less than highest standard is disclosed he declines and then resigns as a Senator. Perhaps he felt comfortable just being in the Senate because another colleague of his with the same record is allowed to or continues to sit there even after his resignation. Or perhaps, the Legislature is seen a lesser than the Executive. A Senator with a conviction is not allowed to hold office of Minister, but, a Minister who is charged is fired for the third time. THERE MUST BE ONE RULE FOR ALL!! Politicians and public officeholders cannot pick and choose which office to respect and which not. They MUST RESPECT EVERY OFFICE which they hold on behalf of the people of this nation. In the 1960s, the citizens of Trinidad and Tobago, professionals, intellectuals and ordinary folk charted their own nation-building plan under a non-governmental and non-party organisation called Pegasus. That organisation was founded in the year our independence by one Geddes Granger (later Makandal Daaga) as a people’s initiative to give direction to nation-building. It is fortuitous that these unsavoury developments are taking place at the time of the anniversaries of Daaga’s passing and birth (8 and 13 August). That nation-building plan under the caption POLITICS said this: (a) “that there should be a high degree of morality in public affairs, and that citizens in positions of authority and responsibility be an example in their public and private life, and moreso, those in public life who should be scrupulous as to their conduct, for their actions may be interpreted and accepted as the norm by the general society; (b) that lest confidence in political authority be undermined there be close scrutiny of candidates elected to office, and that records of their liabilities and assets and sources of investment be made public;” We, The People, Must Set the Standards What is needed is a clear code of ethics and disciplinary process based on broad consultation involving citizens to decide what the standard of conduct for political and public officeholders is and what the consequences of breach must be. This is not a matter of what any individual or any political leader thinks. It is a matter of what WE, as a society, set as the norms we establish. The question is: How are we, as a society, going to set the standards when the PNM-UNC Monopoly continues to deprive us, the majority of the body politic, of our Right to be involved in decision-making in matters that affect us and the nation and to exercise control over elected representatives?? The politicians have usurped the authority to select candidates as parties decide through a process they call screening who are to be candidates. We are reminded by these recent developments of how poor their judgement and their processes have proven to be on too many occasions. We, the people, must no longer be subject to the privileged position of political parties and their leaders which our electoral and political processes have entrenched. As part of empowering the people: ELECTORS MUST HAVE THE RIGHT TO SELECT AND ELECT CANDIDATES!! ELECTORS MUST HAVE THE RIGHT TO RECALL FAILING OR ERRANT ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES!!! Democratic renewal of the electoral and political processes – the system of governance – must put power in the hands of the majority – the People. It is time that the citizens take the initiative once more to chart the course of our nation-building project and vest the sovereignty of this nation in themselves. Clyde Weatherhead A Citizen Fighting for Democratic Renewal of Our Society. 14 August 2019 |
AuthorI am a appalled at the loss of the simple skills of discussing ideas and sharing Opinions to DEEPEN ANALYSIS and UNDERSTAND DEVELOPMENTS to ARRIVE AT SOLUTIONS. Archives
April 2024
Categories |